NFTipper logo NFTipper logo
 

Ant Token Review

Ant

Date Started
2021-06-03
Active
Yes
Honeypot?
Possible
Smart Contract Code Structure
Obscure
Ownership Renounced?
No
Whales Spotted?
Yes
Over-all Ratings
Bad
Conclusion
High Risk of getting RUG-PULLED




Ant Token Review + Smart Contract Audit Summary



Ant started 2021-06-03 and it's currently active, based on the in-depth smart contract audit from different sources and upon checking it's website and other instances like the developers behind this project we can obviously tell based on it's over-all ratings which is Bad and has a HUGE RISK of getting RUG-PULLED.

The basis of our audit came from different areas like how professionally done was their website, their roadmap if it is being followed diligently, social media pages, mission and vision as well as their whitepaper that you can find on their website https://antdefi.io/, also we use verified and well established auditing tools like honeypot.is wherein this NFT was found out that it is a POSSIBLE honeypot trap wherein the smart contract dictates that you can buy but you cannot sell it in the future, although at some point there are others sneaky developers that enable the "selling" feature but after some time they disable it once lots of investors already dive-in.

We have a way of detecting that kind of trick and for this token Ant we can absolutely tell that it has a high possibility of being a honeypot trap, our basis lies on their Smart Contract Code Structure which is OBSCURE and contains malicious codes in nature, only scammers with unreadable and obscure codes have had the bad intentions to do something fishy in the long run, another thing to take note is if the ownership of the token is either renounced or not, for this token, the answer is No.

Another basis we are considering if a token is risky of getting rug pulled is if there are whales spotted on the holders, whales refers to those individuals or entities that hold large shares or percentage of the token Ant wherein they have the potential to manipulate price actions and volatility of the token Ant, so for this token the answer is Yes it has whales.

Therefore we conlude that this token has a High Risk of getting RUG-PULLED in the future, this is not a financial advise, it's always up to you to invest or not on this token, we are here only to give our insights based on the evidences and calculations we made on the smart contract of Ant. So Goodluck and have a safe and happy investing!

Checked using Professional Smart Contract Auditing Tools



Bscheck.eu: 0x309b22772be363db755894ebD8B9F167F4a985C7


Honeypot.is: 0x309b22772be363db755894ebD8B9F167F4a985C7




Ant Smart Contract Audit Details



Description: 

AntDeFi Ecosystem is a Decentralized Finance platform on Binance Smart Chain having an easy interface Decentralized Exchange, Yield Farming to earn interest on staking, Decentralized Asset Management.

 

---

 

Audit Details

 

Audited project: Ant

Deployer address: 0xAc8AF3f5beca8d444B735e2A438353799e090276

Client contacts: Ant team

Blockchain: Binance Smart Chain

Project website: Not provided

 

---

 

Сontracts Details

 

Token contract details for 09.06.2021

Contract name: Ant

Contract address: 0x309b22772be363db755894ebD8B9F167F4a985C7

Total supply: 24,000,000

Token ticker: ANT

Decimals: 18

Token holders: 1

Transactions count: 1

Top 100 holders dominance: 100.00%

Contract deployer address: 0xAc8AF3f5beca8d444B735e2A438353799e090276

Contract’s current owner address: 0x4f4ba4d80f7285bb4f8ffae5d3d2e9980bd68135

 

---

 

Ant Token Distribution

 

Ant Token Distribution

 

---

 

Issues Checking Status

 

Issues Checking Status

 

---

 

Security Issues

 

 High Severity Issues

 No high severity issues found.

 

 Medium Severity Issues

1. Wrong burning

Issue:

There is sending tokens to the dead address in overridden _transfer functions, instead of burning them in token contract.

 

Recommendation:

There should be a burn instead of sending to the dead address.

 

 Low Severity Issues

1. Block gas limit

Issue:

add(uint256 _allocPoint, …), set(uint256 _pid, …) and updateEmissionRate() could invoke massUpdatePools() function, that can fail due to block gas limit if the pool size is too big.

2. add function issue

Issue:

If some LP token is added to the contract twice using function add, then the total amount of reward in function updatePool will be incorrect.

 

Recommendation:

Add the mapping from address to bool and check that same address will not be added twice.

 

Owner privileges

• Owner can drain tokens that are sent to the referral contract which is

useful for withdrawing tokens sent by mistake to the contract.

• Owner can change the operator of the referral contract.

• Owner can change the referral commission rate.

• Operator can change the transfer tax rate.

• Operator can change the burn rate.

• Operator can change the max transfer amount rate.

• Operator can change the min amount to liquify.

• Operator can exclude from antiWhale.

• Operator can change the router and pair contract addresses, which could be not audited contract

 

---

 

Conclusion

Smart contracts contain medium and low severity issues.

 

Source: https://github.com/TechRate/Smart-Contract-Audits/blob/main/Ant%20Smart%20Contract%20Security%20Audit.pdf

.

RELATED NFT's

A list of related NFT's. The following list contains the top latest NFT's and new token crowdsales for crypto investors, as well as this list provides a glimpse overview to indicate which NFT is a suitable/worthwhile for an investment.

阅读免责声明 : 此处提供的所有内容我们的网站,超链接网站,相关应用程序,论坛,博客,社交媒体帐户和其他平台(“网站”)仅供您提供一般信息,从第三方采购。 我们不对与我们的内容有任何形式的保证,包括但不限于准确性和更新性。 我们提供的内容中没有任何内容构成财务建议,法律建议或任何其他形式的建议,以满足您对任何目的的特定依赖。 任何使用或依赖我们的内容完全由您自行承担风险和自由裁量权。 在依赖它们之前,您应该进行自己的研究,审查,分析和验证我们的内容。 交易是一项高风险的活动,可能导致重大损失,因此请在做出任何决定之前咨询您的财务顾问。 我们网站上的任何内容均不构成招揽或要约