USD

AED

AFN

ALL

AMD

ANG

AOA

ARS

AUD

AWG

AZN

BAM

BBD

BDT

BGN

BHD

BIF

BMD

BND

BOB

BRL

BTN

BWP

BYN

BZD

CAD

CDF

CHF

CLF

CLP

CNH

CNY

COP

CRC

CUC

CUP

CVE

CZK

DJF

DKK

DOP

DZD

EGP

ERN

ETB

EUR

FJD

FKP

GBP

GEL

GHS

GIP

GMD

GNF

GTQ

GYD

HKD

HNL

HRK

HTG

HUF

IDR

ILS

IMP

INR

ISK

JMD

JOD

JPY

KES

KGS

KHR

KMF

KPW

KRW

KWD

KYD

KZT

LAK

LBP

LKR

LRD

LSL

LYD

MAD

MDL

MGA

MKD

MMK

MNT

MOP

MRO

MRU

MUR

MVR

MWK

MXN

MYR

MZN

NAD

NGN

NIO

NOK

NPR

NZD

OMR

PAB

PEN

PGK

PHP

PKR

PLN

PYG

QAR

RON

RSD

RUB

RWF

SAR

SBD

SCR

SDG

SEK

SGD

SHP

SLL

SLE

SLL

SRD

SLL

SRD

SSP

SRD

SSP

STD

SSP

STD

STN

STD

STN

SVC

STN

SVC

SYP

SVC

SYP

SZL

SYP

SZL

THB

SZL

THB

TJS

THB

TJS

TMT

TJS

TMT

TND

TMT

TND

TOP

TND

TOP

TRY

TOP

TRY

TTD

TRY

TTD

TWD

TTD

TWD

TZS

TWD

TZS

UAH

TZS

UAH

UGX

UAH

UGX

UYU

UGX

UYU

UZS

UYU

UZS

VES

UZS

VES

VND

VES

VND

VUV

VND

VUV

WST

VUV

WST

ZAR

WST

ZAR

ZMW

XCG

ZMW

ZWL

ZAR

ZWL

ZMW

ZWG

ZWL

coinpedia 2024-12-17 12:56:25

BlackRock vs. MicroStrategy: Who Holds the Better Bitcoin Strategy?

The post BlackRock vs. MicroStrategy: Who Holds the Better Bitcoin Strategy? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF now holds about 2.55% of all Bitcoin, showing that big financial companies are buying a lot of Bitcoin. This has raised concerns because many people worry that institutions like BlackRock might be going against the idea of Bitcoin being decentralized. Even though BlackRock isn’t directly buying Bitcoin, its clients and investors are driving this buying spree. The main worry is that because BlackRock controls the ETF, it could gain too much influence over Bitcoin, potentially moving it away from its original decentralized goals and toward more centralized control. Mark Yusko Insight on Blackrocks Bitcoin ETF Accumulation In response to the market concern, Mark Yusko recently called Bitcoin accumulation by institutions like BlackRock a scam, suggesting a scenario where these institutions could own most of Bitcoin and the government might seize it. However, this idea seems unlikely because such a confiscation would affect not just “bad actors” but also everyday people, pension funds, and institutions holding Bitcoin through ETFs. Even if the government tried to seize Bitcoin, Yusko points out that Bitcoin’s divisibility means the remaining supply would still hold significant value. He believes that one entity leading the pack can cause Bitcoin ETF dominance to go directly into the hands of those still holding it, making it nearly impossible for any one entity to fully control Bitcoin. Bitcoin by nature is decentralized however if Blackrock gains dominance it might turn it towards a centralized approach. This can create a market crash situation if they start selling their Bitcoin holdings similar to the Mt.Gox crash. MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Leverage Strategy: A Calculated Risk? On the other hand, MicroStrategy’s CEO, Michael Saylor, has been raising debt to purchase more Bitcoin, which has drawn mixed reactions. While leverage can be risky, Saylor’s strategy is unique because the debt is secured by Bitcoin itself. Each time MicroStrategy issues bonds or raises equity, it accumulates more Bitcoin than the value of the debt, capturing additional value. The key to Saylor’s approach lies in moderation. Excessive leverage—like the 50x or 100x seen in risky crypto trades—can be catastrophic, but MicroStrategy’s debt levels remain within a prudent range. The company is betting on Bitcoin as an appreciating asset while borrowing in a depreciating fiat currency, a trade Yusko considers smart financial engineering.